Book Review
       
	  Libraries in the Ancient World 
	by Lionel Casson, Yale University Press (Nota Bene books), 2001 
  
	reviewed by Phoebe Ayers 
	This lively book looks at the founding and development of libraries in the
	  western world from the ancient Near East to the European Middle Ages, covering
	  approximately 3000 years of library history in the process. Casson, a well-known
	  classicist, profiles notable libraries (there is an entire chapter on the
	  library at Alexandria). He also chronicles the rise of libraries in everyday
	  life, whether as public institutions or part of a private collection. Parallel
	  to this, Casson tracks related developments in the various societies that
	  he studies, such as the book (there is a separate chapter on the development
	  of the codex), the library catalog (he notes the first known instance of alphabetization),
	  and literacy – as well as what we know about the individual librarians
	  involved. He describes how libraries were developed and how they fit into
	  each of the societies that he looks at, whether as educational institutions
	  in ancient Greece or as a part of bathhouses in ancient Rome.  
	  The book is divided into compact chapters focusing on the ancient Near
	    East, Greece, Alexandria and the growth of libraries, the Roman empire (both
	    inside and outside of Rome), and the Middle Ages. The largest part of the
	    book is on the heyday of Greece and Rome; the Middle Ages is introduced
	    but not looked at with the same depth. Egyptian libraries are not examined,
	    because, as Casson notes, their holdings of writings on papyrus rotted away.  
	  Much of the information that we have about ancient libraries is based by
	    necessity on either archeological records or obscure mentions in various
	    ancient histories and commentaries. However, Casson extrapolates the likely
	    use and policies associated with these libraries. He provides a library-centric
	    focus, talking about aspects that have parallels with libraries today, with
	    intriguing examples. For instance, he talks about accessions procedure in
	    the library at Alexandria (“rolls usually had a tab attached to one
	    end bearing the author's name and ethnic” (35)), collection development
	    at Rome (“War meant loot, and the opportunity to loot offered in certain
	    places a quick way of acquiring a library” (68)), and the borrowing
	    procedures in Sumeria, where the library holdings consisted of clay tablets.
	    From the colophon of one of these tablets comes a breathtaking damage policy
	    that may remain useful as a muttered incantation for the librarian whose
	    patrons damage books:  
           
        “
          'He who breaks this tablet or puts it in water or rubs it until you
          cannot recognize it [and] cannot make it be understood, may Ashur,
          Sin, Shamash, Adad and Ishtar, Bel, Nergal, Ishtar of Ninevah, Istar
          of Arbela, Ishtar of Bit Kidmurri, the gods of heaven and earth and
          the gods of Assyria, may all these curse him with a curse which cannot
          be relieved, terrible and merciless, as long as he lives, may they
          let his name, his seed, be carried off from the land, may they put
          his flesh in a dog's mouth!'” (14).  
	  Throughout, Casson offers up similar gems. His writing is entertaining
	    and fast-paced, there are many pictures and drawings, and at only 145 pages,
	    the book is short enough for even overworked students to read. While Casson
	    does provide detailed notes on his sources, these are not included in the
	    text but are incorporated in an additional 26 pages at the back. There is
	    also an index and a list of illustrations. This is a great compilation of
	    information on a wonderful topic, and for library students, a fascinating
	    look at our predecessors.  
	   
	    
  | 
     
	    
	   
	   
	   
	   
	   
	   
	   
	   
	   
	  "This is a great compilation of
	    information on a wonderful topic, and for library students, a fascinating
	    look at our predecessors." 
	  
	  .
       
     |