|
COMMUNICATION IN MICROFINANCE
An Exploratory Case Study
Irina Gendelman and Giorgia
Aiello
University of Washington
Conclusion
PlaNet Finance provides a global
vision of microfinancing for its sponsors and local institutions.
This vision is based on principles of development such as
solidarity, networking, outreach and advancement of poor people.
Solidarity is stressed on the organizational level in an effort
to promote networking among institutions. Advancement is seen
as a way to integrate established lending models into impoverished
communities. In turn, local offices serve as a link between
the local borrowers and the global institutions. The ITC is
seen as a way to reach the offices and the offices in turn
reach the local people through flip boards, simple icons,
word of mouth and direct presence in the community. The locals
have little to no access to ITC, therefore these local organizations
serve as a connection between global microlending organizations
and their ultimate beneficiaries. This way the global organizations
can communicate indirectly with the poor who borrow their
money at high interest rates due to lack of optional financing
sources.
A local institution, such as Fundachiapas, borrows the international
shared vision of microfinancing and translates it into the
specific cultural context of its location. The same emphasis
that PlaNet Finance places on outreach and Networking through
ITC is placed by Fundachiapas on the relationship between
the local lender and recipient. This is visible in the institution's
location in public space as well as in their construction
of an ideal client and their mission. PlaNet Finance offers
a technical assistance program that is based on tools from
the Impact Knowledge Management (IKM) program, developed by
PlaNet Finance. The PlaNet Finance website states that this
program "aims to optimize the impact of microfinance
on its beneficiaries, by bringing MFIs closer to their clients.
IKM is based on the principle that MFIs able to evaluate the
impact of their involvement on their clients are better prepared
to deliver products that meet demand, and are therefore able
to achieve financial and operational sustainability."
Similarly, the PlaNet Finance mission and relationships are
constructed through a shared global vision of socially responsible
development, in which solidarity among networks gets along
well with traditional credit institutions.
Our analysis suggests how discourse patterns and outreach
models reflecting a global vision of microfinancing can be
translated into specific local contexts without losing their
connection to the traditional structure. Both at the global
and the local level, these communication patterns and models
are what make the difference between microcredit institutions
and regular banks. Whereas global institutions such as PlaNet
Finance place an emphasis on the poverty-fighting potential
of ITC, local institutions like Fundachiapas seem to rely
more on their physical presence in the community's consciousness
and physical space.
Whether the continuity of this shared vision is actually a
crucial and effective factor in the fight against world poverty
or whether it reinforces a relationship of dependence remains
to be explored in further studies. Hopefully, this study offered
some valuable insights on how apparent discontinuities in
organizational culture can actually be seen as translations
of the same shared vision to fit a specific context. This,
we believe, is the contribution that communication scholarship
can give to studies of international development.
|